Home

ACRL

Recent Posts

Recent Comments:

  • Maura Smale: Thanks for your comment, Chris. In practice that’s what we’ve been leaning towards, building...
  • Suz: Perhaps what is needed is a course dedicated to library marketing and promotion. Yes! Or at least a general...
  • Suz: I think there are too many variables at work here to determine whether this would work: namely the personalities...
  • Kristen Garlock: Hello – I have an update on the change JSTOR announced last week. Tomorrow we will change the...
  • Chris Strauber: Usually the best way to persuade faculty is recommendations by other faculty, so I’m inclined...

  • Recent Trackback

  • Day: So You Want to be a Librarian? A Guide For Those Considering an MLS, Current Students & Job Seekers |...

Recommended Posts



Site search

Have a story idea?

Pages

Categories

Archive

Authors

Blogroll

Manage

Login

Web Feeds

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

CLIRing Things Up

The Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) has a new report out on Acquiring Copyright Permissions to Digitize and Provide Open Access to Books. Among the findings: orphan works are a problem. Locating and dealing with publishers is daunting. If a book includes materials for which the publisher had to acquire rights (say, to quote a poem) they don’t feel they have the right to include the book in an open access project. And now that “out of print” doesn’t mean what it used to mean, publishers can hang onto rights for as long as they can print on demand – so even if the copyright holder is willing, the publisher may not be. Ever.

This reminds me that during the e-book boom around 2000 I asked a representative from NetLibrary what the biggest challenge was. He said it was winning over publishers – it took far more time and effort than anything else. That boom, of course, went bust largely because everyone in the industry was trying to figure out how to make money by cutting someone else out of the picture. In an article I wrote about it I quoted a New York Times book critic who asked a key question: “What’s in it for the reader?”

I think the industry needs to ask that question again if they want to be in business.

Write a comment