<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts For Better Conference Discussions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acrlog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/</link>
	<description>Blogging by and for academic and research librarians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:48:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: See Also&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts For Better Conference Discussions</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-25654</link>
		<dc:creator>See Also&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts For Better Conference Discussions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/#comment-25654</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts For Better Conference Discussions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoughts For Better Conference Discussions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Meola</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-24516</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Meola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/#comment-24516</guid>
		<description>Good points Steven.  Also, if you are at a talk and no one asks a question, do the speaker a favor and a least lob a softball to try to get the ball rolling. 

And remember to speak loud enough and clear enough so that people can hear you. Don&#039;t mumble or speak too softly.   This goes for lunch and other informal professional situations as well. If I can&#039;t hear what someone is saying I get tired of saying &quot;what?&quot; and eventually stop talking to them.  Don&#039;t be mousey! Speak up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Steven.  Also, if you are at a talk and no one asks a question, do the speaker a favor and a least lob a softball to try to get the ball rolling. </p>
<p>And remember to speak loud enough and clear enough so that people can hear you. Don&#8217;t mumble or speak too softly.   This goes for lunch and other informal professional situations as well. If I can&#8217;t hear what someone is saying I get tired of saying &#8220;what?&#8221; and eventually stop talking to them.  Don&#8217;t be mousey! Speak up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lawson</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-24511</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/#comment-24511</guid>
		<description>I think the peril of &quot;how we done it good&quot; (which is the semi-snarky way I often see/say it) is not so much that these anecdotes are insufficiently profound or under-theorized, but that people often get too caught up in the specifics of their individual circumstances. I would love to hear how some library set up a new website or information literacy program. I don&#039;t necessarily need to know that the director was on maternity leave at the time or that version X of product Y when used in conjunction with the college&#039;s home-grown registration system tends to throw JavaScript errors.

I guess it is sort of useful to know how &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; done it good, but what I&#039;m really looking for is how &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt; can do it good myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the peril of &#8220;how we done it good&#8221; (which is the semi-snarky way I often see/say it) is not so much that these anecdotes are insufficiently profound or under-theorized, but that people often get too caught up in the specifics of their individual circumstances. I would love to hear how some library set up a new website or information literacy program. I don&#8217;t necessarily need to know that the director was on maternity leave at the time or that version X of product Y when used in conjunction with the college&#8217;s home-grown registration system tends to throw JavaScript errors.</p>
<p>I guess it is sort of useful to know how <em>you</em> done it good, but what I&#8217;m really looking for is how <em>I</em> can do it good myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Overholt</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/comment-page-1/#comment-24509</link>
		<dc:creator>John Overholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/01/26/thoughts-for-better-conference-discussions/#comment-24509</guid>
		<description>Steven, I certainly understand what you&#039;re saying, and I hope that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rbms.info/discussion_groups/marc_for_special_collections/index.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; the discussion group I co-chair&lt;/a&gt;  offers an appropriate mix of practical advice and theoretical underpinnings. But I have to say that what I frequently enjoy least about conferences are the presentations that seem so abstracted from reality that they might as well be discussing the results of a particle accelerator experiment.

I don&#039;t mean to single you out, because everyone uses this phrase to describe the concept, but the sarcastic contempt that drips from &quot;how my library does it good&quot; really sets my teeth on edge. Doing it well, whatever &quot;it&quot; may be, is a goal we ought all to aspire to, and I know of no better way to acheive that than through informal, practical conversations with my colleagues. The reason I agreed to chair my group is because I find it by far the most useful thing I do at ALA meetings. I would enjoy it less if the participants began to worry that their comments were insufficiently profound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, I certainly understand what you&#8217;re saying, and I hope that <a href="http://www.rbms.info/discussion_groups/marc_for_special_collections/index.shtml" rel="nofollow"> the discussion group I co-chair</a>  offers an appropriate mix of practical advice and theoretical underpinnings. But I have to say that what I frequently enjoy least about conferences are the presentations that seem so abstracted from reality that they might as well be discussing the results of a particle accelerator experiment.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to single you out, because everyone uses this phrase to describe the concept, but the sarcastic contempt that drips from &#8220;how my library does it good&#8221; really sets my teeth on edge. Doing it well, whatever &#8220;it&#8221; may be, is a goal we ought all to aspire to, and I know of no better way to acheive that than through informal, practical conversations with my colleagues. The reason I agreed to chair my group is because I find it by far the most useful thing I do at ALA meetings. I would enjoy it less if the participants began to worry that their comments were insufficiently profound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
