The ACRLog blog team extends its congratulations to the three libraries that are the winners of the 2007 Excellence in Academic Libraries award. Sponsored by ACRL and Blackwells Book Services, the award recognizes the staff of a college, university, and community college library for programs that deliver exemplary services and resources to further the educational mission of the institution.
The 2007 winners are:
– University Category: Georgia Institute of Technology Library and Information Center, Atlanta, GA, Richard W. Meyer, Dean and Director of Libraries
– College Category: Elizabeth Huth Coates Library at Trinity University, San Antonio, TX, Diane J. Graves, University Librarian
– Community College Category: Hostos Community College/CUNY Library, Bronx, NY, Lucinda Zoe, Professor and Chief Librarian
Each winning library will receive $3,000 and a plaque, to be presented at an award ceremony held on each recipients campus. The winners also will receive special recognition at the ACRL Presidents Program during the American Library Association (ALA) Annual Conference on Monday, June 25, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. in Washington D.C.
Posted by StevenB
This morning’s inbox included the delightful news that another open-access information literacy journal has started up and released its first issue. From the email:
Volume 1, Issue 1 is now available from the Information Literacy website: http://www.informationliteracy.org.uk/JIL.aspx
JIL is an international, peer-reviewed, academic journal that aims to investigate Information Literacy (IL) within a wide range of settings. Papers on any topic related to the practical, technological or philosophical issues raised by the attempt to increase information literacy throughout society are encouraged. JIL is published in electronic format only and is an open-access title. The aim of JIL is to investigate and to make generalised observations on how Information Literacy impacts on organisations, systems and the individual. While recognising the firm foothold already established by IL in the Higher Education sector, the editorial board, seeks to consolidate and extend this to a wider educational audience. Furthermore the board welcomes ever-wider interpretations of IL that extend its theoretical interpretation and practical use beyond the educational arena and across national frontiers.
Interestingly, this journal also provides its definition of information literacy and the understanding that skills/competencies in informaiton literacy require(http://www.cilip.org.uk/professionalguidance/informationliteracy/definition/):
Information literacy is knowing when and why you need information, where to find it, and how to evaluate, use and communicate it in an ethical manner.
This definition implies several skills. We believe that the skills (or competencies) that are required to be information literate require an understanding of:
a need for information
the resources available
how to find information
the need to evaluate results
how to work with or exploit results
ethics and responsibility of use
how to communicate or share your findings
how to manage your findings.
Two things that strike me about this. First, perhaps obviously – the different listing of “top level” items than we see in many standards documents in the United States. Second, that this is a list of understandings required for information literacy skills and so I wonder if these understandings are considered to co-develop with skills, be pre-requisite for, or causal of? Good food for thought.
JIL looks a welcome addition to the information literacy field. Happy reading!