<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gorman Forgets to Wind the Clock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acrlog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/</link>
	<description>Blogging by and for academic and research librarians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:48:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Meola</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-30749</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Meola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/#comment-30749</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s his reason that has gone to sleep: he overgeneralizes and his argument (if you can find it) is a straw man. Web 2.0 is just not as great a threat to authenticity, fixity, or authority as he thinks.  I noticed he really likes the word authoritative. Can you imagine him in the Milgram experiments? 

I checked his Vita. For someone so into expertise and authority, you&#039;d think he&#039;d have more educational credentials than 2 years at a technical college. Then again, maybe this explains some things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s his reason that has gone to sleep: he overgeneralizes and his argument (if you can find it) is a straw man. Web 2.0 is just not as great a threat to authenticity, fixity, or authority as he thinks.  I noticed he really likes the word authoritative. Can you imagine him in the Milgram experiments? </p>
<p>I checked his Vita. For someone so into expertise and authority, you&#8217;d think he&#8217;d have more educational credentials than 2 years at a technical college. Then again, maybe this explains some things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.G. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-30732</link>
		<dc:creator>K.G. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/#comment-30732</guid>
		<description>Sterne and hypertext: /head explodes (though honestly, it&#039;s the humor of Shamela I would love to see applied to this tzimmis)

Steven, I agree. I received that same email, and so did several other bloggers I know. It was blatant pot-stirring, though it did give me a chance to observe that in skewing its team of experts to a roster that is overwhelmingly straight white men, the EB was undermining its own &quot;why we carefully select only the very best scholars to represent a topic&quot; argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sterne and hypertext: /head explodes (though honestly, it&#8217;s the humor of Shamela I would love to see applied to this tzimmis)</p>
<p>Steven, I agree. I received that same email, and so did several other bloggers I know. It was blatant pot-stirring, though it did give me a chance to observe that in skewing its team of experts to a roster that is overwhelmingly straight white men, the EB was undermining its own &#8220;why we carefully select only the very best scholars to represent a topic&#8221; argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollie F</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-30653</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/#comment-30653</guid>
		<description>Well, shoot, I have to add a comment to a post that references Tristram Shandy. You&#039;ve just got to wonder how much fun Sterne would have had with hypertext and Web 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, shoot, I have to add a comment to a post that references Tristram Shandy. You&#8217;ve just got to wonder how much fun Sterne would have had with hypertext and Web 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven bell</title>
		<link>http://acrlog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-30624</link>
		<dc:creator>steven bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acrlblog.org/2007/06/13/gorman-forgets-to-wind-the-clock/#comment-30624</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you decided to write about this Barbara because quite frankly I&#039;m feeling cynical about this whole &quot;Hey Gorman wrote a blog post - let&#039;s all make a big fuss over of it&quot;. It serves it purpose as fodder for discussion, but I have to say that the email from EB encouraging me to leave a comment and post about it makes the whole thing seem like a contrived gimmick to get publicity for the EB blog. What I found interesting is that virtually all of the other bloggers over at the EB blog have written lots of posts. - many more interesting than what Gorman has to say.  Gorman - has just these two (with a third promised). The posts seem intentionally crafted to get a specific reaction as opposed to someone who wants to create an open discussion. I would have just as soon said let&#039;s not even bother to pay attention to it. But I&#039;m glad you did because I enjoyed your thoughtful post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you decided to write about this Barbara because quite frankly I&#8217;m feeling cynical about this whole &#8220;Hey Gorman wrote a blog post &#8211; let&#8217;s all make a big fuss over of it&#8221;. It serves it purpose as fodder for discussion, but I have to say that the email from EB encouraging me to leave a comment and post about it makes the whole thing seem like a contrived gimmick to get publicity for the EB blog. What I found interesting is that virtually all of the other bloggers over at the EB blog have written lots of posts. &#8211; many more interesting than what Gorman has to say.  Gorman &#8211; has just these two (with a third promised). The posts seem intentionally crafted to get a specific reaction as opposed to someone who wants to create an open discussion. I would have just as soon said let&#8217;s not even bother to pay attention to it. But I&#8217;m glad you did because I enjoyed your thoughtful post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
