Home

ACRL

Recent Posts

Recent Comments:

  • Marc: I really enjoyed this post! Like Sarah said, working as an academic librarian is a juggling act. One thing that...
  • Mark K.: Yes…Sharing the credit is an inherently good-person and truthful thing to do. It’s also...
  • CharS: “It’s much more challenging to start researching from scratch…” But that’s what...
  • Barbara Fister: I like the people I work with, I have plenty of variety in my work, and if I make a mistake, nobody...
  • Barbara Fister: I agree – plus it’s more fun. Another issue is that we can’t just settle for...

  • Recent Trackback

Recommended Posts



Site search

Have a story idea?

Pages

Categories

Archive

Authors

Blogroll

Manage

Login

Web Feeds

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

A Top Twenty Academic Library List From The Same Folks Who Rate Party Schools

Though it is probably not as eagerly sought after by prospective (and even active) college students as their top party schools list, the folks at Princeton Review may have noticed this and decided that students would also want to know more about the best libraries. You can get to the list via a post at LISNews (they supply an account so you don’t have to register – thanks LISNews) if you’d like to see which libraries made the top twenty. Apparently there is but a single criterion for making the list. The Princeton Review makes it clear at the top of the list that the rankings are based “on students’ assessment of library facilities”. I haven’t visited nearly all of these libraries, but I could understand why Valparaiso – which I have visited – would make the list if it is based on how much students like the library building.

Tp be sure, any of the libraries on this list is an example of an academic library that is doing good work and is, in at least some specific area(s) (collection, facility, service quality, etc.) a standout. To be sure, there are many others that are equally good and would deserve to be in the top twenty. I suppose that is the primary reason why a list like this is bound to irk many academic librarians. But I thought I’d check to see if The Princeton Review’s methodology for rating academic libraries would actually identify truly excellent academic libraries – according to the real experts – academic librarians. So I visited ACRL’s web page that lists all the winners, present and past, of the Excellence in Libraries Award. It was first awarded in 2000. Of the Princeton Review’s top twenty, four academic libraries have also won the ACRL award. They are Cornell, Loyola University New Orleans, Mount Holyoke College and University of Virginia. So four out of twenty isn’t great, but I have to admit that I didn’t think there would be any matches between the two lists.

Perhaps next year The Princeton Review list will have a little footnote that provides the link to the ACRL Award page – just to give their readers another perspective on which schools have the best libraries. Of course, the students may be too busy checking out the top party schools to take much notice. And in case you are wondering, West Virginia University, this year’s top party school, also takes the number five spot on the best libraries list. They must have some awesome parties at that library.

Comments

Comment from Tom Kirk
Time: August 27, 2007, 11:27 pm

It may be tempting for ACRL to cooperate with Princeton Review in an effort to raise the profile of academic libraries. But associating with those who want to reduce the selection of the best to a list without the transparency of the criteria used is dangerous. The rest of higher education is trying to run away from such lists. ACRL’s work with NSSE to develop appropriate measures is much better use of our energies.

Write a comment