How Much Is Enough?
Iâ€™ve been hearing more and more, recently, about people dropping out of service and professional development opportunities because they cannot secure funding from their institutions to attend. A member of a statewide committee I am on said this fall her continued membership would be contingent on her institutionâ€™s ability to pay for her travel to the meetings (since this is Ohio, that only ever involves driving, and her institution is only 25 miles away from where meetings are held). My ALA committee recently accepted a proposal for a panelist at a Midwinter discussion forum, but the panelist just e mailed me to say her institution would not provide her with funding to go, and were there any funding opportunities for her? I asked a coworker just this morning if she was going to Midwinter or not and she said no, and that the reason she wasnâ€™t was because of funding. â€œOur travel stipend only pays for most of a trip to Chicago,â€ she said.
Well, sheâ€™s right about that: my official faculty stipend is $500 a year (though after you add in the extras it can be as much as $1500). And professional travel is not cheap. Someone planning to go to Midwinter next month can expect to spend well over $1,000: $165 for registration, $129/night (plus 12.5% tax) for the cheapest hotel on the official list, $71 per diem for meals (according to the U.S. General Services Administration). My flight from Ohio cost $405, airport transportation via the Super Shuttle in San Diego is $16 round trip, and airport parking back home is $10/day.
I find conferences energizing. At them I get great ideas, stay on top of whatâ€™s going on in the field and always meet interesting people. I learn lots, sleep little, and talk talk talk. But what are our institutionsâ€™ obligations to pay for this kind of professional development? Whatâ€™s the payoff to them when we attend? A tight-fisted fiscal officer would point out that service can be done locally and research can be presented through publications rather than presentations. To learn new things, people can take webinars from the comfort of their own offices. And, while librarians who do national service and presentation may see it come back to them in the form of slight pay increases, itâ€™s not enough to offset the cost of the travel itself. I donâ€™t attend national conferences merely for my own benefit (do I?). Are we really supposed to do this just for the love of it? While no administrator has ever come out and asked me to quantify the institutional benefits of my professional development, is it really only a matter of time?
I asked if ALA had any funds to tap into for my committeeâ€™s speaker, and the answer was that â€œthere is a long-standing ALA policy against providing stipends to librarians.â€ I’m sure the reasoning is that librarians should support the work of the organization and the development of our professional colleagues, but, facing financial pressures and funding shortfalls, it seems like many librarians are opting out.
According to my calculations, I spent over $1800 of my own money attending conferences and meetings this calendar year after all my reimbursements (which were well over $1500 due to a generous conference scholarship and part of the pot of travel money not used by my tenured colleagues). For me, itâ€™s money well spent, but itâ€™s also a lot of money, and I know itâ€™s a lot more than many can afford. I donâ€™t think our institutions are trying to send the message that professional development is not important, but I wonder if more and more of the rising cost of conference attendance has been shifting to the individual over the last decade and, with the economy being what it is, weâ€™ve reached a kind of breaking point. Is conference attendance going down? I looked at the attendance for several conferences over the past few years, and itâ€™s inconclusive: NASIG attendance has gone down, but ALA attendance has fluctuated and ER&L conference attendance is up. But I know ALA sections are worried about declining participation in committees and have been promoting virtual participation. Is this the answer?
It seems like the strategy of self-funding conference attendance, on top of membership and section fees, is not viable for the long term, though Iâ€™m not sure what the answer is â€“ giving more breaks to presenters and other participants, upping virtual opportunities, or consolidating our opportunities so we get the most bang for our conference dollars.
Like many, my take-home pay is going down on January 1. But my rent isnâ€™t going down, and neither is my student loan payment or the price of gas or any number of other essentials, so I am going to have to find other places in my personal budget to cut back. Iâ€™m not sitting out San Diego, but I wonder how many of my ALA committee members will make it.