Sudden Thoughts And Second Thoughts

  • When “Good Enough” Isn’t
  • One of the things I like about blogging for ACRLog is that I get to share some of my favorite writers and their columns with the readers – especially when they can add interesting perspectives to our understanding of higher education. One of the columns I’ve been following for a number of years is The Irascible Professor. The IP (really Dr. Mark Shapiro) works at Krispy Kreme University somewhere in California. This week’s installment features a guest column titled “Just Tell Me I’m Wonderful and Give Me An A“. The author describes the difficulty in delivering constructive criticism to students who’ve been handed “A”s in most of their college courses even though their writing (and no doubt research skills to match) is atrocious. There have been a number of articles in the library literature, on issues related to student research skills, that suggest librarians should be satisfied when student research is just “good enough.” I suppose the problem with “good enough”, as this column suggests, is that it’s relative. When students finally confront a professor that does not accept “good enough” and who sets higher expectations for research, it can cause students to react badly. If we consider ourselves teachers, then perhaps we – and our faculty colleagues – ought to pay more attention to raising our expectations for student research rather than allowing them to settle for good enough.

  • What Can We Learn From An MTV Study
  • Last week MTV released a study titled “Just Cause.” This study explores youth activism and what factors motivate students to engage in social causes. Since the study examines the behavior of youth ages 12 through 24, I thought there might be something there that could shed some light on how academic librarians might improve their ability to connect with students. It is important to pay attention to demographic and behavioral studies of our primary user community. So what did I learn (I browsed through the complete 81 page version of the report)? For one thing, within this population segment there are several subgroups identified by names such as “candy strippers”, “teacher’s pet”, “watchers” and “growers”. The data tables may be worth a look if you want to learn more about sources of influence and factors that motivate students to volunteer in communities. But overall, I didn’t see anything of a truly revealing nature in this report. But it does show that a segment within the younger generation does seek out volunteer opportunities and service to their community. How might we tap into the passion for activism that is found in the younger generation? Are there ways in which academic librarians could support student involvement in their communities? It’s something worth thinking about.

  • Libraries Losing To Google On The Comic Page
  • You know that Google has truly permeated popular culture when it’s the subject of a Family Circus cartoon. In Friday’s strip (4/28 – unfortunately not on the web) Billy’s doing some research and claims “It’s easier to Google people than to find them in an encyclopedia” – and that’s while the Mom is holding the encyclopedia volume. Hardly a ringing endorsement for traditional research tools I’d say. I guess this proves Billy is a Millennial. Well, we can only hope in a future strip Dolly will have some words of wisdom about doing research the old fashioned way.

    But Google’s presence in the comics didn’t stop there. The very next day (Sat. 4/29), in Overboard, Louie and Raymond – two dogs for those who don’t follow this strip about goofy pirates – are Googling “dirty pictures” on their laptop computer. So I thought it was bad enough that Billy Googles for his homework, but then I find out that even dogs that live on a pirate ship are using Google for their research.

    Not that I’ve got anything against Google but you might think that the library would eventually get some good publicity in the comics. Not so. The last library sighting I recall is from that Zits strip from a few weeks ago in which Jeremy is doing some history research on the computer while his mother remininces about going to the library. After he finishes his research in several seconds (also a Millennial) Jeremy says “Wait, you went to a library?”. Again, hardly a ringing endorsement.

    So even in the world of comics Google is getting all the attention, while libraries are getting dissed. I can only imagine what sort of impact this is having on all the impressionable youth who turn to the comics for their reading pleasure.

  • Will Just Keep An Eye On Second Life For Now
  • I read the BusinessWeek article on Second Life with great interest. It’s an interesting concept, and seems to be a logical next step in the wave of social community development taking place on the web. When you join Second Life you can, as the article says “roam endless landscapes and cityscapes, chat with friends, create virtual homes on plots of imaginary land, and conduct real business.” You had to know that some librarians would try to get involved in this, and it appears a group has already created a library for this virtual world. I’m not quite sure I get it yet, but perhaps this is part of the “be where the users are” movement. For now I’ll just keep an eye on this one. I think we’ve still got plenty of work to do in our “first life”, especially when many of our students are turning to Internet search engines for their assignment-based research. Let’s do our best to connect with them in local places and virtual learning spaces before we broaden our reach into new virtual worlds beyond our academic communities.

    4 thoughts on “Sudden Thoughts And Second Thoughts”

    1. I’ve also been following the “Second Life” library developments, and decided to set up a (free) account and explore. In particular, I am interested in the fact that some librarians have been exploring the teaching of information literacy classes within this world.

      So, essentially, traditional searching and research techniques are being taught in a virtual world. After doing some more exploring, I recognize the addictive quality of this virtual world (similar to myspace, friendster and other social communities) and feel like now is a good time for libraries and librarians to aggressively integrate Second Life into information literacy.

      The same information literacy concepts can be taught, but in a new, more interactive and fun, manner.

    2. Just a thought or two about Second Life and the library project. You mention focusing on connecting with students in virtual spaces. There are already a number of initiatives that are using Second Life itself as the virtual learning space. There’s an entire mailing list devoted to real life educators in Second Life and a person employed by Linden Lab with the sole purpose of pursuing and facilitating educational projects in-world.

      The library project seeks to explore the provision of services in an immersive and growing digital community, very similar (but not identical) to what Neal Stephenson called the Metaverse in his novel Snow Crash. Having spent a number of hours over the past few weeks inside Second Life, it is not hard for me to see how this type of environment could evolve into a place to conduct real life business, whether commercial, academic or otherwise. At some level, this is already happening as an evening adventure in World of Warcraft is becoming the new afternoon golf outing.

      If the growth continues, as I suspect it will, then at least some of us in the information profession should be looking at how we can be a part of that.
      I concur that it is too early for everyone to flock to Second Life, but I am pleased that this project has drawn some limited degree of attention. The work is important and driven largely by people contributing their own personal time. I hope what emerges continues to be worthy of your commentary.

    3. With faculty developing instruction within Second Life, research groups using it to collaborate, and already dissertations investigating it, I think I wonder a bit about the statement “Let’s do our best to connect with them in local places and virtual learning spaces before we broaden our reach into new virtual worlds beyond our academic communities.” Our academic communities are situating themselves in this world “beyond.” Maybe not everyone … but certainly there is a trend… Is it really that “beyond”?

    4. Good enough earns a “C”; substantially better than good enough earns a “B” and Wow earns an “A.” If students do not want me to evaluate them, I just forget to enter a grade.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.