Editor’s note: We welcome a guest blog post from Angela Pashia, who was an academic librarian for 12 years before becoming an ICF-Certified (ACC) leadership coach.
For the first half of my library career, I was adamant that I didn’t want to move into any formal leadership role. I was an instruction and liaison librarian, and I loved working directly with students and faculty to teach critical information literacy. I also got to teach a credit bearing information literacy course on a regular basis, which gave me a lot of opportunities to practice using critical pedagogy. I valued these opportunities to challenge rigid hierarchies and empower students to shift from seeing themselves as just consumers to producers of information.
My vision of what it means to be in management did not align with these values at all.
Fast forward several years, through becoming a reluctant leader, learning that I absolutely loved the opportunity to develop a team, and then becoming a leadership coach for librarians… Now I work with library leaders who are struggling with similar challenges rooted in similar narratives about what it means to be an effective leader.
In this narrative, the leader knows everything about how everything in the unit functions, and always has an answer for how to move forward in any situation. It’s very clear that this leader is directing everything – whether that’s through giving orders or just through always handing out solutions to every situation, for team members who’ve learned that it’s simplest to just go ask what the leader thinks. It’s clear that this leader is the one making all of the decisions that keep this library functioning and moving forward.
The best version of this leader comes across as a very knowledgeable parental figure, telling you how things should be done because they care about you. But they’re still telling you what to do, instead of helping you learn to work through the process on your own. This leader does provide development opportunities for their staff, but that tends to focus on molding you to follow in their footsteps, regardless of whether that’s the best fit for you.
Another version of this leader just gives you instructions and then grades how well you followed those instructions each year on your annual evaluation. They may or may not provide the scaffolded lessons that you need to complete the assignment well.
We don’t see this leader admitting when they don’t know things or asking many questions or having doubts. We don’t see this leader actively sharing power with their team members in a way that would loosen up their control.
This narrative about effective leadership becomes problematic when a new leader steps into their position knowing that they don’t know everything yet. They need to ask questions, but fear that doing so will communicate that they’re not qualified for this role. And that leads to imposter syndrome.
And this narrative doesn’t fit those of us who value collaboration, empowerment, and shared governance. I resisted moving into a leadership position for years because I didn’t want to be the person telling people what to do. My clients need support in learning new ways to lead, because this narrative of leadership doesn’t fit their values, either.
And that’s why I fell in love with coaching.
For me, learning coaching skills, as defined and practiced by the International Coaching Federation (and described in my last post), provided a way to transfer the principles of critical pedagogy from the classroom to leading a team.
Banking Knowledge
I learned about the “banking method of education” long before I read Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Students aren’t bank vaults waiting for us to deposit bits of knowledge. Genuine learning is a dialogic process between student and teacher, building toward the development of a critical consciousness. Instead of being the “sage on the stage,” we can better support student learning by being a “guide on the side.”
And yet, we love depositing bits of knowledge! Many of the leaders I work with feel helpful when they come up with a great solution to every problem their team members bring to them. Leading a team is different from teaching a classroom, but these are often missed opportunities to develop that team member’s skills.
When a team member comes to you for help with a problem, using a coaching approach shifts you from depositing a solution to engaging in a dialogic process. When you start with a question like, “What ideas have you already thought of?”, and then ask genuinely curious follow-up questions to workshop one of those ideas, they learn more about how your organization works. Depending on the context, that may include learning to think critically about embedding equity and accessibility into library services, programs, and policies.
Holistic Approach
Building on Freire’s work, bell hooks proposed an “engaged pedagogy” that recognizes both student and teacher as whole people actively participating in the learning dialog. Students are not just passive consumers of information, and both sides bring a lifetime of rich experiences and emotional lives into the classroom.
The leaders I work with recognize that this is true with their team members, as well, but don’t always feel prepared to respond effectively when emotions are affecting how team members are showing up. When they do open a conversation, it can turn into two hours of the team member venting about everything they’re dealing with, which throws their schedule into disarray and leaves them emotionally drained. So now they’re afraid to even open that conversation again. And it’s one thing to know this intellectually, but when you feel pressured to keep things moving as quickly as possible because your library is doing too much with too little, it’s easy to overlook the bigger picture.
Learning to effectively use a coaching model to structure your conversation can help you navigate some of these tricky situations. This approach provides a roadmap to acknowledge those emotions, dig below the surface to identify the root of the issue, and figure out a path forward. It takes practice to find the right balance of listening to what’s going on now before jumping into problem-solving mode, but these models provide guard rails to keep you from just getting stuck in complaints.
And building a habit of using these ICF-style coaching skills can create openings to find out what’s really going on for people.
Self-actualization
As part of this engaged pedagogy, hooks wrote that “teachers must be actively committed to a process of self-actualization that promotes their own wellbeing if they are to teach in a manner that empowers students” (p. 15). This includes ongoing learning and ongoing reflection.
A coaching approach to leadership also prioritizes your own wellbeing and ongoing learning. Developing a curious, open, nonjudgmental mindset requires you to give yourself space to reflect, consider other perspectives, and make sure that your emotions aren’t skewing your view of a given situation. To support librarians in their ongoing learning and development, I regularly write a newsletter about applying a coaching approach in your library.
And, although it’s not exactly connected to critical pedagogy, I’ve found that this self-actualization process helps to combat imposter syndrome. Explicitly adopting a leadership style that encourages curiosity and questions gives new leaders permission to admit to not already knowing everything. And that helps to support their well-being.
What questions does this spark for you?
I’d love to continue this discussion in the comments section!
References
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.